0

Full Content is available to subscribers

Subscribe/Learn More  >

Identification of Coincident Features in Pipelines Using ILI Data

[+] Author Affiliations
Jane Dawson

PII Pipeline Solutions, Cramlington, Northumberland, UK

Rodger Weller, Girish Rao

PII Pipeline Solutions, Overland Park, KS

Paper No. IPC2012-90134, pp. 27-37; 11 pages
doi:10.1115/IPC2012-90134
From:
  • 2012 9th International Pipeline Conference
  • Volume 2: Pipeline Integrity Management
  • Calgary, Alberta, Canada, September 24–28, 2012
  • Conference Sponsors: International Petroleum Technology Institute, Pipeline Division
  • ISBN: 978-0-7918-4513-4
  • Copyright © 2012 by ASME

abstract

Many pipelines are vulnerable to multiple threats and damage types such as internal and/or external corrosion, axial and/or circumferential cracking, laminations, gouging, dents, ovalities and wrinkles. These different types of damage may occur in isolation or can occur coincidental at the same location in the pipeline. Whilst two or more of these feature types may be coincident in the pipeline, the different feature types often require detection by different ILI technologies which are quite often run at different times and even by different ILI vendors.

It is important to identify where different types of features are coincident:

• Discrimination and sizing of certain feature types can be adversely affected and hence uncertainties may be higher at these locations.

• Evaluation of feature severity should account for the types of feature present and any interaction between features.

• To aid the excavation and repair planning processes.

It can be difficult and time consuming to identify the exact location where multiple features may be coincident with each other because this requires accurate alignment, accounting for positional tolerances, matching and overlay of data from ILI runs of different technologies and often from several years apart.

This paper describes an approach to identify where coincidental features occur within a pipeline by:

• Combining and overlaying multiple ILI technologies and data sets in a common interface.

• Allowing different proximity tolerances to be used to account for positional accuracy in the determination of coincident feature groups.

• Enabling the identification of the ILI reported features (e.g., cracks, internal and external corrosion, dents, mill faults including laminations, gouges etc.) that could be coincident and therefore may interact.

Case studies are used to illustrate the approach and to evaluate the results obtained.

Copyright © 2012 by ASME
Topics: Pipelines

Figures

Tables

Interactive Graphics

Video

Country-Specific Mortality and Growth Failure in Infancy and Yound Children and Association With Material Stature

Use interactive graphics and maps to view and sort country-specific infant and early dhildhood mortality and growth failure data and their association with maternal

NOTE:
Citing articles are presented as examples only. In non-demo SCM6 implementation, integration with CrossRef’s "Cited By" API will populate this tab (http://www.crossref.org/citedby.html).

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In