0

Full Content is available to subscribers

Subscribe/Learn More  >

A Comparison Between Recent Advances in Cylindrical Nodal Diffusion Methods

[+] Author Affiliations
David V. Colameco, Kostadin N. Ivanov

Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA

Rian H. Prinsloo, Djordje I. Tomasevic

NECSA, Pretoria, Gauteng, South Africa

Suzanne Theron

University of Pretoria, Pretoria, Gauteng, South Africa

Paper No. HTR2008-58136, pp. 503-510; 8 pages
doi:10.1115/HTR2008-58136
From:
  • Fourth International Topical Meeting on High Temperature Reactor Technology
  • Fourth International Topical Meeting on High Temperature Reactor Technology, Volume 1
  • Washington, DC, USA, September 28–October 1, 2008
  • Conference Sponsors: ASME
  • ISBN: 978-0-7918-4854-8 | eISBN: 978-0-7918-3834-1
  • Copyright © 2008 by ASME

abstract

The resurgence of High Temperature Reactor (HTR) technology has prompted the development and application of modern calculation methodologies, many of which are already utilized in the existing power reactor industry, to HTR designs. To this end, the use of nodal diffusion methods for full core neutronic analysis is once again considered for both their performance and accuracy advantages. Recently a number of different approaches to Two-Dimensional (2D) and 3D multigroup cylindrical nodal diffusion methods were proposed by various institutions for use in HTR, and specifically Pebble Bed Modular Reactor (PBMR), reactor calculations. In this regard we may mention the NEM code from the Pennsylvania State University (PSU), based on the Nodal Expansion Method; and the OSCAR code from NECSA, utilizing a conformal mapping approach to the Analytic Nodal Method. In this work we will compare these two approaches in terms of accuracy and performance. Representative problems, selected to test the methods thoroughly, were devised and based on both a modified version of the PBMR 400 MW benchmark problem and a “cylindrisized” version of the IAEA two-group problem. The comparative results between OSCAR and NEM are given, focusing on global reactivity estimation, as well as power and flux errors as compared to reference finite-difference solutions. These results indicate that both OSCAR and NEM recover the global reference solution for the IAEA problem, and show power errors which are generally acceptable for nodal methods. For the PBMR problem the accuracy is similar, but some convergence difficulties are experienced at the outer boundaries of the system due to the very large dimensions of the reflector (when compared to typical water-moderated reactors). For both codes a significant performance increase was found as compared to finite-difference calculations, which is the method currently employed by the PBMR (Pty) Ltd company. In conclusion it seems that nodal methods have potential for use in the HTR analysis, and specifically PBMR calculational arena, although cylindrical geometry based nodal methods will have to develop toward maturity before becoming the industry standard.

Copyright © 2008 by ASME

Figures

Tables

Interactive Graphics

Video

Country-Specific Mortality and Growth Failure in Infancy and Yound Children and Association With Material Stature

Use interactive graphics and maps to view and sort country-specific infant and early dhildhood mortality and growth failure data and their association with maternal

NOTE:
Citing articles are presented as examples only. In non-demo SCM6 implementation, integration with CrossRef’s "Cited By" API will populate this tab (http://www.crossref.org/citedby.html).

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In