0

Full Content is available to subscribers

Subscribe/Learn More  >

An Investigation Into Cooling System Control Strategies for Data Center Airflow Containment Architectures

[+] Author Affiliations
Michael K. Patterson

Intel, Dupont, WA

Rainer Weidmann, Manuel Mair

T-Systems International GmbH, Munich, Germany

Markus Leberecht

Intel GmbH, Feldkirchen, Germany

Richard M. Libby

Intel, Hillsboro, OR

Paper No. IPACK2011-52090, pp. 479-488; 10 pages
doi:10.1115/IPACK2011-52090
From:
  • ASME 2011 Pacific Rim Technical Conference and Exhibition on Packaging and Integration of Electronic and Photonic Systems
  • ASME 2011 Pacific Rim Technical Conference and Exhibition on Packaging and Integration of Electronic and Photonic Systems, MEMS and NEMS: Volume 2
  • Portland, Oregon, USA, July 6–8, 2011
  • ISBN: 978-0-7918-4462-5
  • Copyright © 2011 by ASME

abstract

Data Center efficiency is critical to successful operation of today’s large IT installations. The reduction of infrastructure energy use will allow an increase in IT carrying capacity and / or a reduction in operating costs. The cooling portion of the data center Power Usage Effectiveness (PUE) can represent a significant cost and energy burden to the data center. The use of containment hardware (hot aisle, chimney, or cold aisle containment) is a good step in reducing the Data Center PUE; however the specifics of the implementation remains a challenge and some legacy controls strategies limit the efficacy of their use. The most typical control scheme in today’s data center is the return airflow temperature modulating a linked supply temperature and airflow. This control scheme is unsuitable for an advanced data center and limits the efficiency that can be gained with the containment strategy. But the optimal control scheme for a containment strategy remains a matter of discussion and debate. This paper reports on testing performed at our collaborative data center test lab facility in Munich, Germany where we have explored three different control designs for a containment strategy. The primary goal for energy savings in a containment strategy is to provide just enough cool air to the servers such that the server fans are satisfied without causing any recirculation to occur from the hot side of the containment. We investigated control based on temperature, pressure, and velocity measurements. The specifics of each are discussed as well as recommendations for choosing the appropriate controls. Practical considerations as well as system implementation recommendations are also shared. Each strategy can be made to work but the pressure control scenario provided the best level of control.

Copyright © 2011 by ASME

Figures

Tables

Interactive Graphics

Video

Country-Specific Mortality and Growth Failure in Infancy and Yound Children and Association With Material Stature

Use interactive graphics and maps to view and sort country-specific infant and early dhildhood mortality and growth failure data and their association with maternal

NOTE:
Citing articles are presented as examples only. In non-demo SCM6 implementation, integration with CrossRef’s "Cited By" API will populate this tab (http://www.crossref.org/citedby.html).

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In