0

Full Content is available to subscribers

Subscribe/Learn More  >

Co-Firing Coal, Biomass and Waste Fuels in Circulating Fluidized Bed Boilers to Reduce CO2 Emissions

[+] Author Affiliations
Ronald Hancharik

Metso Power, Charlotte, NC

Paper No. POWER2011-55312, pp. 59-67; 9 pages
doi:10.1115/POWER2011-55312
From:
  • ASME 2011 Power Conference collocated with JSME ICOPE 2011
  • ASME 2011 Power Conference, Volume 1
  • Denver, Colorado, USA, July 12–14, 2011
  • ISBN: 978-0-7918-4459-5
  • Copyright © 2011 by ASME

abstract

The combustion of CO2 neutral solid fuels like biomass and waste-based fuels with circulating fluidized bed (CFB) boiler designs has become an accepted way to generate electric power and process steam to reduce global CO2 emissions (i.e. reduce “carbon footprint”) and hence to reduce the potential impact on climate change. In the European Union, for example, there is a co-combustion directive to encourage the use of biomass and waste as energy sources with the co-firing of coal. Quite often biomass and waste combustion in CFB’s have unique technical challenges when compared to fossil fuels. The technical challenges of firing these CO2 neutral fuels do impact CFB boiler design and may impact plant lifecycle and reliability when compared to coal. Among these are combustion bed agglomeration, furnace and heating surface slagging, and new forms of corrosion potential. However, when co-firing these CO2 neutral fuels with coal, these challenges can be tempered in a positive way through inherent changes in the flue gas chemistry and other design considerations. Co-firing makes sense. In addition to reducing the carbon footprint of a boiler project through use of biomass and waste, these energy sources can have a significant positive impact on plant financials owing to low cost supply. However these fuels can have wide variations in availability and energy content over the course of the many years of a boiler’s life. As such, maintaining coal as a supplemental fuel or back-up fuel also provides significant benefit in terms of guaranteeing the energy input supply and thereby securing plant availability. This benefit can help lower project financial risk and improve financial attractiveness and viability. This paper describes this type of boiler, its design considerations and operating history. Highlighted herein is the operating facility in Pori, Finland, commissioned in 2008, which is a 60 MWe CFB boiler burning peat, biomass and recycled waste fuel (RDF) with coal as a back-up fuel. Other facilities with similar design and with operating history of over 10 years are included as reference.

Copyright © 2011 by ASME

Figures

Tables

Interactive Graphics

Video

Country-Specific Mortality and Growth Failure in Infancy and Yound Children and Association With Material Stature

Use interactive graphics and maps to view and sort country-specific infant and early dhildhood mortality and growth failure data and their association with maternal

NOTE:
Citing articles are presented as examples only. In non-demo SCM6 implementation, integration with CrossRef’s "Cited By" API will populate this tab (http://www.crossref.org/citedby.html).

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In