0

Full Content is available to subscribers

Subscribe/Learn More  >

Selecting Technology Alternatives for Product Families Through Technological Coverage and Functional Verification

[+] Author Affiliations
Eric Coatanéa, François Christophe

Helsinki University of Technology, TKK, Finland

Fabrice Alizon

Keyplatform, Paris, France

Bernard Yannou

Ecole Centrale Paris, Chatenay-Malabry, France

Paper No. DETC2008-49713, pp. 365-376; 12 pages
doi:10.1115/DETC2008-49713
From:
  • ASME 2008 International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference
  • Volume 4: 20th International Conference on Design Theory and Methodology; Second International Conference on Micro- and Nanosystems
  • Brooklyn, New York, USA, August 3–6, 2008
  • Conference Sponsors: Design Engineering Division and Computers in Engineering Division
  • ISBN: 978-0-7918-4328-4 | eISBN: 0-7918-3831-5
  • Copyright © 2008 by ASME

abstract

In product platform development the technology selection issue has seldom been studied. This article tries to fill this gap by introducing an original Technology Selection Method (TSM) to help designers to manage technology selection within the design of a product family. This method is based on technological coverage and functional verification, including the behaviour of the future product family. Practically, the proposed approach uses a multi-objective analysis based on dimensional analysis theory to choose the best technology available. The developed approach has three major points of interest. First, dimensional analysis theory is considered as a specific type of multi-objective optimisation approach which aggregates attributes using a weighting method based on the laws of physics. This manner of viewing dimensional analysis theory provides a scientific coherence to the weighting process which is not obtainable with other multi-objective methods. Second, the principle of similarity included in dimensional analysis theory is extended and allows a range of technologies and range of functions to be compared in a unique design space. Third, the dimensional analysis provides a powerful simulating tool for studying different kinds of behaviours and interactions between attributes. Consequently, dynamic aspects can be analysed and robustness analyses can be performed. The interest of such a method is highlighted through a case study involving a family of small excavators. We suggest that the potential scope of the approach is broad and our aim is to demonstrate the entire scope of the approach in future research.

Copyright © 2008 by ASME

Figures

Tables

Interactive Graphics

Video

Country-Specific Mortality and Growth Failure in Infancy and Yound Children and Association With Material Stature

Use interactive graphics and maps to view and sort country-specific infant and early dhildhood mortality and growth failure data and their association with maternal

NOTE:
Citing articles are presented as examples only. In non-demo SCM6 implementation, integration with CrossRef’s "Cited By" API will populate this tab (http://www.crossref.org/citedby.html).

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In