0

Full Content is available to subscribers

Subscribe/Learn More  >

Application of Automated Optimisation to Pump Impeller Design

[+] Author Affiliations
Susanne Krueger, Wolfgang Maurer

Sulzer Pumps Ltd., Winterthur, Switzerland

Paper No. AJK2011-06083, pp. 437-444; 8 pages
doi:10.1115/AJK2011-06083
From:
  • ASME-JSME-KSME 2011 Joint Fluids Engineering Conference
  • ASME-JSME-KSME 2011 Joint Fluids Engineering Conference: Volume 1, Symposia – Parts A, B, C, and D
  • Hamamatsu, Japan, July 24–29, 2011
  • Conference Sponsors: Fluids Engineering Division
  • ISBN: 978-0-7918-4440-3
  • Copyright © 2011 by ASME

abstract

Dominating factors in today’s pump design process are reducing time to market and increasing demands on product flexibility. With these requirements, an adaptation of the pump design process is crucial and the need for an optimisation environment is only one part. In this paper we present our semi-automated impeller design process and its integration into a fully automated optimisation environment. The setup of the workflow for both approaches including impeller design tool, mesh generation, CFD analysis, and the steering tool are described. The optimisation process starting from a set of basic designs (Designs of Experiments, DOE) over the proper optimisation to the design analysis is explained by means of a suction impeller with opposing objectives like maximising hydraulic efficiency and minimising NPSH3% values yielding different geometry solutions all being a compromise. During this process, performance values for duty point, partload and overload are evaluated by CFD. An overall efficiency parameter is defined representing the averaged efficiency of these three operating points. Suction performance can be handled differently and evaluated only for different operating points and treated either as objectives or constraints. The approach developed in this paper is finally applied for two test cases. The first example describes the design of a suction impeller which has to fit into an existing casing and limits us to the modification of the blade shape only. Objectives are overall and duty point efficiency, NPSH3% at duty point is handled as a constraint. The overall efficiency objective requires a high plateau-like efficiency from partload to overload operating condition. The classical way of an optimisation is starting with a DOE, followed by an optimisation, visualisation of the Pareto Frontier and selection of the final design. The second example requires the replacement of a suction impeller which is supposed to operate cavitation free at site conditions. Main objectives are the reduction of NPSHInc and increase of partload efficiency while maintaining NPSH3% and overall efficiency. Limitations in development time forces us to go a different way in the design process. We start with a general exploration of the parameter range and study the parameter influence on the objectives and complete the process with an optimisation for a very limited number of blade parameters to obtain the objectives.

Copyright © 2011 by ASME

Figures

Tables

Interactive Graphics

Video

Country-Specific Mortality and Growth Failure in Infancy and Yound Children and Association With Material Stature

Use interactive graphics and maps to view and sort country-specific infant and early dhildhood mortality and growth failure data and their association with maternal

NOTE:
Citing articles are presented as examples only. In non-demo SCM6 implementation, integration with CrossRef’s "Cited By" API will populate this tab (http://www.crossref.org/citedby.html).

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In