0

Full Content is available to subscribers

Subscribe/Learn More  >

Challenges Associated With License Renewal Fatigue Evaluations for an Older-Vintage BWR Plant

[+] Author Affiliations
Tyler D. Novotny, Terry J. Herrmann

Structural Integrity Associates, Inc., Centennial, CO

George V. Mileris, Raymond M. Pace

Entergy Nuclear Northeast, Plymouth, MA

Paper No. PVP2010-25329, pp. 173-179; 7 pages
doi:10.1115/PVP2010-25329
From:
  • ASME 2010 Pressure Vessels and Piping Division/K-PVP Conference
  • ASME 2010 Pressure Vessels and Piping Conference: Volume 7
  • Bellevue, Washington, USA, July 18–22, 2010
  • Conference Sponsors: Pressure Vessels and Piping Division
  • ISBN: 978-0-7918-4926-2 | eISBN: 978-0-7918-3878-5
  • Copyright © 2010 by ASME

abstract

As plants prepare for license renewal, extending their original operating licenses from 40 years to 60 years of plant operation, various tasks are required to be performed. Some of the required tasks include validation of the current fatigue evaluations for ASME Class 1 components, evaluation of environmental affects for a subset of those components, and calculation of revised component life to demonstrate acceptability for the entire license renewal period. Validation of the current fatigue evaluations is a significant challenge for older-vintage plants because the documentation of transient parameters and event severity was often not rigorous, especially during the early years of plant operation. This is primarily because historical data gathered in the early years was difficult to obtain before the implementation of modern computer systems and was therefore only collected at limiting times and locations. As a result, transients were typically considered to be full design basis severity events. Also, the design basis transient definitions, as defined in the original Final Safety Analysis Report (FSAR), were limited to a simpler, bounding set to help simplify the process. Whereas these simplifications are typically conservative and make it easier for the staff implementing plant procedures, they can challenge the ability of utilities to be able to demonstrate long-term acceptability for license renewal where additional margins are required. The purpose of this paper is to provide an example of the efforts expended on this issue for the Pilgrim Nuclear Power Station (PNPS). The intent is to educate the reader on the efforts involved, the vast array of input that is needed, and the possible hurdles that may be encountered for the validation and re-evaluation of Class 1 component fatigue for license renewal. Prior to starting work on the fatigue analysis, PNPS requested that SI develop a design specification for the fatigue reevaluation project. The importance of this document is that it maintained consistency and documented methods to be used along with design inputs.

Copyright © 2010 by ASME

Figures

Tables

Interactive Graphics

Video

Country-Specific Mortality and Growth Failure in Infancy and Yound Children and Association With Material Stature

Use interactive graphics and maps to view and sort country-specific infant and early dhildhood mortality and growth failure data and their association with maternal

NOTE:
Citing articles are presented as examples only. In non-demo SCM6 implementation, integration with CrossRef’s "Cited By" API will populate this tab (http://www.crossref.org/citedby.html).

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In