0

Full Content is available to subscribers

Subscribe/Learn More  >

Practical Design Process for Flowlines With Lateral Buckling

[+] Author Affiliations
Joe Jin, Jean M. Audibert, Wan C. Kan

ExxonMobil Development Company, Houston, TX

Paper No. OMAE2010-20478, pp. 565-573; 9 pages
doi:10.1115/OMAE2010-20478
From:
  • ASME 2010 29th International Conference on Ocean, Offshore and Arctic Engineering
  • 29th International Conference on Ocean, Offshore and Arctic Engineering: Volume 5, Parts A and B
  • Shanghai, China, June 6–11, 2010
  • Conference Sponsors: Ocean, Offshore and Arctic Engineering Division
  • ISBN: 978-0-7918-4913-2 | eISBN: 978-0-7918-3873-0
  • Copyright © 2010 by ASME

abstract

In the past decade, lateral buckling has received growing attention in flowline design. Joint Industry Projects (JIPs) have led to publications of design guidelines, such as the SAFEBUCK design guideline and DNV recommended practice F110. Safe design of flowlines with lateral buckling involves complex considerations. Inadequate or late recognition of such complexities often results in major impacts on project execution. Experience gained in recent projects allowed us to improve the design process and design methods with incorporation of practical considerations. This paper presents three key aspects in developing robust flowline design with lateral buckling issues: 1) understand and reduce uncertainties in design basis for lateral buckling assessment, including operating conditions, characterization of geotechnical properties and flowline installation; 2) determine flowline-soil interactions with incorporation of field observations and engineering judgment; 3) manage impacts of lateral buckling through all project phases. This paper shares several key engineering considerations successfully used in recent flowline projects in deep waters where the seabed soil is characterized as soft clay. First, calculation of flowline embedment based on remolded shear strength instead of undrained shear strength eliminates the need to guess the embedment dynamic amplification factor. This approach is based on cyclic degradation of the soil shear strength and field observations. Second, a simple engineering model of axial resistance is proposed. The axial resistance is a cumulative behavior and hence only the average undrained shear strength is used for the calculation. Third, a robust engineering solution takes alignment in establishing quality design basis, engineering judgment to avoid unrealistic design load combinations, and trade-off among lateral buckling design effort, flowline construction and installation, and qualification of flowline capacities. And last, early recognition of lateral buckling issues and development of mitigation strategies are keys to project solutions. This paper also suggests that lateral buckling is very complex in reality and requires more investigations.

Copyright © 2010 by ASME
Topics: Design , Buckling

Figures

Tables

Interactive Graphics

Video

Country-Specific Mortality and Growth Failure in Infancy and Yound Children and Association With Material Stature

Use interactive graphics and maps to view and sort country-specific infant and early dhildhood mortality and growth failure data and their association with maternal

NOTE:
Citing articles are presented as examples only. In non-demo SCM6 implementation, integration with CrossRef’s "Cited By" API will populate this tab (http://www.crossref.org/citedby.html).

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In