0

Full Content is available to subscribers

Subscribe/Learn More  >

Comparison of Multiaxial Fatigue Criteria to Evaluate the Life of Crankshafts

[+] Author Affiliations
Frederico Rodrigues Minucci, Auteliano Antunes dos Santos, Jr.

University of Campinas, Campinas, SP, Brazil

Rafael A. Lima e Silva

ThyssenKrupp Metalúrgica Campo Limpo Ltda., Campinas, SP, Brazil

Paper No. IMECE2010-39018, pp. 775-784; 10 pages
doi:10.1115/IMECE2010-39018
From:
  • ASME 2010 International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition
  • Volume 11: New Developments in Simulation Methods and Software for Engineering Applications; Safety Engineering, Risk Analysis and Reliability Methods; Transportation Systems
  • Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada, November 12–18, 2010
  • Conference Sponsors: ASME
  • ISBN: 978-0-7918-4448-9
  • Copyright © 2010 by ASME

abstract

Crankshafts are subject to multiaxial fatigue because of the complex stress distribution caused by the loads when this engine component is in service. So far there is no universally accepted approach to multiaxial fatigue; each theory is used for a determined application. Among the many high-cicle fatigue criteria, two have been largely accepted to be used with mechanical components, the one based on the critical plane and the one based on the stress invariant. This work presents the comparison of the safety factors calculated with those criteria for a conventional crankshaft. As critical plane criteria we chose those known as Matake, McDiarmid, and Dang Van, each one with a different approach. Same way we chose the Sines, Crossland, and Kakuna-kawada criterias as the stress invariant approaches. First, the work describes the basic concepts and the fatigue criteria listed. Following that the loads over the crankshaft are estimated from the loads flowing through the conrods and from the dynamic of the movement for critical points of the crankshaft. The third step was to apply the criteria to evaluate the safety when the component is working at 1700, 2100, and 3050rpm, which are the speeds where the engine is subjected to the maximum torque, maximum power, and at the maximum speed conditions. The results showed that the engine analyzed did not fail, that the critical plane criteria is more conservative, and that the safety factor is not smaller than 1.77.

Copyright © 2010 by ASME
Topics: Fatigue

Figures

Tables

Interactive Graphics

Video

Country-Specific Mortality and Growth Failure in Infancy and Yound Children and Association With Material Stature

Use interactive graphics and maps to view and sort country-specific infant and early dhildhood mortality and growth failure data and their association with maternal

NOTE:
Citing articles are presented as examples only. In non-demo SCM6 implementation, integration with CrossRef’s "Cited By" API will populate this tab (http://www.crossref.org/citedby.html).

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In