0

Full Content is available to subscribers

Subscribe/Learn More  >

Impact of Ethanol Content on Full-Load Combustion Behavior and Engine Control Unit Response for a Direct-Injection, Spark-Ignition Engine

[+] Author Affiliations
Andrew M. Ickes, Thomas Wallner

Argonne National Laboratory, Argonne, IL

Paper No. IMECE2010-38982, pp. 563-573; 11 pages
doi:10.1115/IMECE2010-38982
From:
  • ASME 2010 International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition
  • Volume 11: New Developments in Simulation Methods and Software for Engineering Applications; Safety Engineering, Risk Analysis and Reliability Methods; Transportation Systems
  • Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada, November 12–18, 2010
  • Conference Sponsors: ASME
  • ISBN: 978-0-7918-4448-9
  • Copyright © 2010 by ASME

abstract

With its high octane number and potentially favorable greenhouse gas and energy balance characteristics, ethanol offers potential to replace portions of gasoline as a transportation fuel. System optimization to utilize the increased knock resistance and evaporative cooling effect of ethanol can increase the performance and efficiency of spark-ignition engines. Though basic engine emissions and performance effects of ethanol fuel blends have been widely reported, limited studies have examined the details of combustion behavior and the interplay between fuel ethanol content and the behavior of the engine control system. This paper quantifies the response of a production engine control unit to ethanol fuel blends, along with the subsequent combustion behavior and resulting engine performance at high-load operating conditions. Steady-state testing is conducted on a modern direct-injection, spark-ignition, four-cylinder engine using a base engine calibration at full-load (wide-open throttle) conditions across a range of engine speeds from 1500 to 4000 rpm. Test fuels include gasoline, neat ethanol, and an intermediate blend of gasoline and ethanol. A combination of low-speed engine measurements and crank angle based cylinder pressure measurements are used to demonstrate the impact of increasing fuel ethanol content on engine control parameters. Ethanol’s increased knock resistance, demonstrated by its higher octane number, compared to gasoline makes combustion less susceptible to knock as ethanol fraction in the fuel increases. Accordingly, less spark retard is required to avoid knock at high engine load, translating to higher fuel conversion efficiency and increased specific power output. This effect is explored within the framework of a production engine calibration which uses active knock-avoidance feedback control. The relative contribution between a more aggressive engine calibration and increased fuel-evaporation charge-cooling to the increased efficiency and power resulting from increasing fuel ethanol percentage is also characterized.

Copyright © 2010 by ASME

Figures

Tables

Interactive Graphics

Video

Country-Specific Mortality and Growth Failure in Infancy and Yound Children and Association With Material Stature

Use interactive graphics and maps to view and sort country-specific infant and early dhildhood mortality and growth failure data and their association with maternal

NOTE:
Citing articles are presented as examples only. In non-demo SCM6 implementation, integration with CrossRef’s "Cited By" API will populate this tab (http://www.crossref.org/citedby.html).

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In