0

Full Content is available to subscribers

Subscribe/Learn More  >

Spill Consequence Analysis: A Method to Prioritize Integrity Excavations of Liquid Pipelines

[+] Author Affiliations
Jana M. Haggins, Edgar I. Cote, Kristine Morgan, Ehab Shaheen

Cimarron Engineering Ltd., Calgary, AB, Canada

Paper No. IPC2010-31645, pp. 685-692; 8 pages
doi:10.1115/IPC2010-31645
From:
  • 2010 8th International Pipeline Conference
  • 2010 8th International Pipeline Conference, Volume 4
  • Calgary, Alberta, Canada, September 27–October 1, 2010
  • Conference Sponsors: International Petroleum Technology Institute and the Pipeline Division
  • ISBN: 978-0-7918-4423-6 | eISBN: 978-0-7918-3885-3
  • Copyright © 2010 by ASME

abstract

Corrosion and stress corrosion cracking (SCC) control programs are elements of pipeline integrity management. These programs often include in-line inspections (ILI’s) to identify, characterize and size anomalies, followed by field excavations to repair defects, remediate coating failures, and establish tool sizing accuracy. The highest priority excavations target anomalies with the lowest predicted remaining strength or deepest flaws. In cases where loss of pipeline integrity is highly consequential, selection of additional excavation sites based on the risk of failure is warranted. As specified in Annex B of CSA Z662-07, the risk of failure combines probability (typically based on the predicted remaining life of known corrosion or cracking features) with an evaluation of consequence along the pipeline length. Consequence evaluation typically considers the impacts of health and safety, environmental, property damage, public disruption, service interruption and financial loss. A practical methodology for evaluating consequence for liquid pipelines was developed for the NPS 10 Alberta Products Pipeline (APPL) in Alberta, Canada. Comprising of three (3) parts, the methodology starts with an evaluation of spill volume along the pipeline based on valve closure times and pipeline inventory drawdown. Combined with soil absorption data and topography, the spill volumes are used to model spill areas along the pipeline. Finally, the spill areas are overlaid on a classification of land use along the pipeline to quantify the relative spill consequence. The land use classification developed for this analysis has commonalities with the definitions for High Consequence Areas (HCA) and Unusually Sensitive Areas (USA) within U.S. Code of Federal Regulations (49 CFR, Part 195). Prioritized segments of the pipeline with elevated consequence levels were identified and used with the probability of failure to calculate risk and prioritize sites for ILI excavation programs.

Copyright © 2010 by ASME
Topics: Pipelines

Figures

Tables

Interactive Graphics

Video

Country-Specific Mortality and Growth Failure in Infancy and Yound Children and Association With Material Stature

Use interactive graphics and maps to view and sort country-specific infant and early dhildhood mortality and growth failure data and their association with maternal

NOTE:
Citing articles are presented as examples only. In non-demo SCM6 implementation, integration with CrossRef’s "Cited By" API will populate this tab (http://www.crossref.org/citedby.html).

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In