0

Full Content is available to subscribers

Subscribe/Learn More  >

Investigation of Soft and Hard Ceramics and Single Crystals for Resonant and Off-Resonant Piezoelectric Energy Harvesting

[+] Author Affiliations
Alper Erturk, Daniel J. Inman

Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA

Ho-Yong Lee

Ceracomp Co. Ltd., Asan, Chungnam, Republic of Korea

Paper No. SMASIS2010-3796, pp. 589-596; 8 pages
doi:10.1115/SMASIS2010-3796
From:
  • ASME 2010 Conference on Smart Materials, Adaptive Structures and Intelligent Systems
  • ASME 2010 Conference on Smart Materials, Adaptive Structures and Intelligent Systems, Volume 1
  • Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA, September 28–October 1, 2010
  • Conference Sponsors: Aerospace Division
  • ISBN: 978-0-7918-4415-1 | eISBN: 978-0-7918-3886-0
  • Copyright © 2010 by ASME

abstract

Piezoelectric materials have received the most attention for vibration-to-electricity conversion over the last decade. Harmonic excitation is the most commonly investigated form of excitation in piezoelectric energy harvesting and it can be divided into two subgroups as resonant and off-resonant excitations. Although resonant excitation is preferred for extracting the maximum electrical power output from the device, there are several practical cases where it is not possible to excite the energy harvester at its resonance frequency (e.g. varying frequency excitations or very low frequency excitations where the input frequency is much lower than the fundamental resonance frequency). Several researchers have used soft piezoceramics (e.g. PZT-5A and PZT-5H) for power generation under resonant excitation. Typically, these soft piezoceramics have larger piezoelectric strain constant and larger elastic compliance compared to hard piezoceramics (e.g. PZT-4 and PZT-8). However, it is known that hard piezoceramics can have an order of magnitude larger mechanical quality factor compared to soft piezoceramics. Consequently, hard piezoceramics can generate more power under resonant excitation even though researchers have mostly focused on the soft piezoceramics. On the other hand, soft piezoceramics can generate more power for low frequency excitation below the resonance frequency due to their large effective piezoelectric stress constants. This difference is also the case for soft and hard single crystals (e.g. soft PMN-PZT versus hard PMN-PZT-Mn). In addition, single crystals can generate more power than ceramics at low off-resonant frequencies due to their large dynamic flexibilities (which is related to their large elastic compliances). This work investigates the specific advantages of soft and hard piezoceramics and single crystals for vibration-based energy harvesting. An experimentally validated piezoelectric energy harvester model is used to compare the power generation performances of soft and hard ceramics as well as soft and hard single crystals. The soft and the hard piezoceramics considered in this work are PZT-5H and PZT-8, respectively, while the soft and the hard single crystals considered here are PMN-PZT and PMN-PZT-Mn, respectively.

Copyright © 2010 by ASME

Figures

Tables

Interactive Graphics

Video

Country-Specific Mortality and Growth Failure in Infancy and Yound Children and Association With Material Stature

Use interactive graphics and maps to view and sort country-specific infant and early dhildhood mortality and growth failure data and their association with maternal

NOTE:
Citing articles are presented as examples only. In non-demo SCM6 implementation, integration with CrossRef’s "Cited By" API will populate this tab (http://www.crossref.org/citedby.html).

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In