0

Full Content is available to subscribers

Subscribe/Learn More  >

LES Flow Control Simulations for Highly Loaded Low Pressure Turbine Airfoil (L1A) Using Pulsed Vortex Generator Jets

[+] Author Affiliations
Mounir B. Ibrahim, Olga Kartuzova, Daniel J. Doucet

Cleveland State University, Cleveland, OH

Ralph J. Volino

United States Naval Academy, Annapolis, MD

Paper No. GT2010-23015, pp. 2537-2551; 15 pages
doi:10.1115/GT2010-23015
From:
  • ASME Turbo Expo 2010: Power for Land, Sea, and Air
  • Volume 7: Turbomachinery, Parts A, B, and C
  • Glasgow, UK, June 14–18, 2010
  • Conference Sponsors: International Gas Turbine Institute
  • ISBN: 978-0-7918-4402-1 | eISBN: 978-0-7918-3872-3
  • Copyright © 2010 by ASME

abstract

Seven different cases were examined experimentally and computationally to study LPT flow control using pulsed VGJs for the L1A airfoil. These cases represent a combination of variation in Reynolds number, Re (25,000, 50,000 and 100,000), based on the suction surface length and the nominal exit velocity from the cascade, blowing ratio, B (from 0.25 to 1), dimensionless frequency, F (from 0.035 to 0.56) and duty cycle, DC (10% and 50%). The data was obtained for the pressure distribution along the airfoil and downstream in the wake as well as for velocity profiles at six different stations downstream of the suction peak. The CFD was done with LES utilizing version 6.3.26 of the finite-volume code ANSYS Fluent. The CFD did provide further insight to better understand the physics of flow control. The comparison between CFD and experimental results for Cp, velocity profiles and Ψint is reasonable for all cases examined. Two of the cases examined did indicate that the higher DC could compensate for the lower F value. However, the effect of increasing the frequency appears to be stronger than increasing the DC value. The results from CFD using the Q-Criterion clearly illustrate how a separation bubble will persist at the lower frequency case (Case (2)) and the disturbances created from the jet flow do not have enough energy or time to travel further downstream to cause reattachment. On the other hand, the higher frequency case (Case (6)) did exhibit a penetration of the disturbance created by the jet into the separated region and caused reattachment, especially at the trailing edge. It appears that the jet was capable of breaking the large bubble into smaller ones with reattachment in between.

Copyright © 2010 by ASME

Figures

Tables

Interactive Graphics

Video

Country-Specific Mortality and Growth Failure in Infancy and Yound Children and Association With Material Stature

Use interactive graphics and maps to view and sort country-specific infant and early dhildhood mortality and growth failure data and their association with maternal

NOTE:
Citing articles are presented as examples only. In non-demo SCM6 implementation, integration with CrossRef’s "Cited By" API will populate this tab (http://www.crossref.org/citedby.html).

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In