0

Full Content is available to subscribers

Subscribe/Learn More  >

Accuracy of Conventional Adiabatic Effectiveness and Heat Transfer Augmentation Factors in Predicting Heat Flux Into a Turbine Blade Leading Edge

[+] Author Affiliations
Laurene D. Dobrowolski, David G. Bogard

The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX

Silvia Ravelli

The University of Bergamo, Bergamo, Italy

Paper No. GT2010-23438, pp. 1795-1803; 9 pages
doi:10.1115/GT2010-23438
From:
  • ASME Turbo Expo 2010: Power for Land, Sea, and Air
  • Volume 4: Heat Transfer, Parts A and B
  • Glasgow, UK, June 14–18, 2010
  • Conference Sponsors: International Gas Turbine Institute
  • ISBN: 978-0-7918-4399-4 | eISBN: 978-0-7918-3872-3
  • Copyright © 2010 by ASME

abstract

This paper focuses on the legitimacy of using conventional predictions, based on adiabatic wall temperature (Taw ) and heat transfer coefficient (HTC) augmentation, of heat flux into a film cooled leading edge. To answer this question, the heat flux predicted using Taw was compared to the heat flux into a conducting leading edge. The study used numerical simulations with the k-ε turbulence model of FLUENT. The model simulated was a three-row leading edge with one row of holes on the stagnation line and two additional rows located at ±25°, which has been experimentally studied extensively. The adiabatic wall temperature was obtained from an adiabatic simulation. External heat transfer coefficients were determined from a constant heat flux simulation using a density ratio of DR = 1.0, as is commonly done experimentally. A conjugate heat transfer simulation was also run to give the surface temperature and heat flux into the conducting leading edge. Overall, the heat transfer was well predicted with the use of Taw and HTC augmentation. However, between the holes, conventional predictions of heat transfer were poor, with disparity up to 30% when compared with the conducting wall heat flux obtained from the conjugate heat transfer simulation. Thermal boundary layer profiles were used to understand the disparity between the heat fluxes obtained from the conventional prediction and the conducting wall simulation.

Copyright © 2010 by ASME

Figures

Tables

Interactive Graphics

Video

Country-Specific Mortality and Growth Failure in Infancy and Yound Children and Association With Material Stature

Use interactive graphics and maps to view and sort country-specific infant and early dhildhood mortality and growth failure data and their association with maternal

NOTE:
Citing articles are presented as examples only. In non-demo SCM6 implementation, integration with CrossRef’s "Cited By" API will populate this tab (http://www.crossref.org/citedby.html).

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In