0

Full Content is available to subscribers

Subscribe/Learn More  >

Comparison of Stone Comminution Produced by Two Different Reflector Configurations in an HM-3 Lithotripter

[+] Author Affiliations
Jun Qin, W. Neal Simmons, Pei Zhong

Duke University, Durham, NC

Paper No. IMECE2007-43061, pp. 281-284; 4 pages
doi:10.1115/IMECE2007-43061
From:
  • ASME 2007 International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition
  • Volume 2: Biomedical and Biotechnology Engineering
  • Seattle, Washington, USA, November 11–15, 2007
  • Conference Sponsors: ASME
  • ISBN: 0-7918-4296-7 | eISBN: 0-7918-3812-9
  • Copyright © 2007 by ASME

abstract

Clinical experience has demonstrated that the performance of the 2nd and 3rd generation shock wave lithotripters in terms of stone comminution has become inferior to the 1st generation Dornier HM-3 lithotripter. A primary change in the design of the newer generation lithotripters is the enlarged aperture of the shock source, leading to a higher peak pressure with a smaller focal area. To evaluate the effect of beam size on stone comminution in the same lithotripter, we developed a reflector insert for the HM-3 that can substantially increase the peak pressure while concomitantly tightening the beam size of the lithotripter field. Using a light spot hydrophone, we have characterized the acoustic fields produced by the two reflector configurations at 20 kV. The peak positive pressure and the −6dB beam size were found to be 87 MPa and 4 mm for the HM-3 with the reflector insert, which are significantly different than the corresponding values (51 MPa and 13 mm) for the original reflector. In contrast, the peak tensile pressure and the total acoustic energy of the lithotripter pulse were found to be similar (−12 MPa and 59 mJ with the reflector insert, −11 MPa and 52 mJ for the original reflector). Stone comminution was evaluated in four different holders in order to determine the effect of lateral spreading of residual fragments on lithotripsy outcome. After 250 shocks, the results of stone comminution in a mesh holder of D = 15 mm (63% vs. 61%) were similar. However, the corresponding values produced by the HM-3 with reflector insert in a finger cot of D = 15 mm (45%) and in a membrane holder of D = 30 mm (14%) were significantly lower than those produced by the original reflector (56% and 26%). Further, the efficiencies of stone comminution in both the mesh holder and the finger cot were much higher than that in the membrane holder. These results suggest that a wide beam size in the original HM-3 may increase stone comminution efficiency when the fragments are spread out to a large area during lithotripsy. In contrast, when the fragments are confined during lithotripsy the beam size may not influence significantly the treatment outcome.

Copyright © 2007 by ASME

Figures

Tables

Interactive Graphics

Video

Country-Specific Mortality and Growth Failure in Infancy and Yound Children and Association With Material Stature

Use interactive graphics and maps to view and sort country-specific infant and early dhildhood mortality and growth failure data and their association with maternal

NOTE:
Citing articles are presented as examples only. In non-demo SCM6 implementation, integration with CrossRef’s "Cited By" API will populate this tab (http://www.crossref.org/citedby.html).

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In