Full Content is available to subscribers

Subscribe/Learn More  >

Experimental and Numerical Film Effectiveness Downstream a Row of Compound Angle Film Holes

[+] Author Affiliations
A. Khanicheh, M. E. Taslim

Northeastern University, Boston, MA

Paper No. IMECE2003-41414, pp. 37-44; 8 pages
  • ASME 2003 International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition
  • Heat Transfer, Volume 2
  • Washington, DC, USA, November 15–21, 2003
  • Conference Sponsors: Heat Transfer Division
  • ISBN: 0-7918-3718-1 | eISBN: 0-7918-4663-6, 0-7918-4664-4, 0-7918-4665-2
  • Copyright © 2003 by ASME


High component lifetimes of modern gas turbines can be achieved by cooling the airfoils effectively. Film cooling is commonly employed on the airfoils and other engine hot section surfaces in order to protect them from the high thermal stress fields created by exposure to combustion gases. Complex geometries as well as optimized cooling considerations often dictate the use of compound-angled film cooling hole. In the present experimental and computational study, the effects that two different compound angle film cooling hole injection configurations have on film cooling effectiveness are investigated. Film cooling effectiveness measurements have been made downstream of a single row of compound angle cylindrical holes with a diameter of 7.5 mm, and a single row of compound angle, diffuser-shaped holes with an inlet diameter of 7.5 mm. The cylindrical holes were inclined (α=25°) with respect to the coverage surface and were oriented perpendicular to the high-temperature airflow direction. The diffuser-shaped holes had a compound angle of 45 degrees with respect to the high temperature air flow direction and, similar to the cylindrical film holes, a 25-deg angle with the coverage surface. Both geometries were tested over a blowing ratio range of 0.7 to 4.0. Surface temperatures were measured along four longitudinal rows of thermocouples covering the downstream area between two adjacent holes. The results showed that the best overall protection over the widest range of blowing ratios was provided by the diffuser-shaped film cooling holes. Compared with the cylindrical hole results, the diffuser-shaped expansion holes produced higher film cooling effectiveness downstream of the film cooling holes, particularly at high blowing ratios. The increased cross sectional area at the shaped hole exit compared to that of the cylindrical hole lead to a reduction of the mean velocity, thus the reduction of the momentum flux of the jet exiting the hole. Therefore, the penetration of the jet into the main flow was reduced, resulting in an increased cooling effectiveness. A commercially available CFD software package was used to study film cooling effectiveness downstream of the row of holes. Comparisons between the experimentally measured and numerically calculated film effectiveness distributions showed that the computed results are in reasonable agreement with the measured results. Therefore, CFD can be considered as a viable tool to predict the cooling performance of different film cooling configurations in a parametric study. A more realistic turbulence model, possibly adopting a two-layer model that incorporates boundary layer anisotropy, in the computational study may improve the predicted results.

Copyright © 2003 by ASME



Interactive Graphics


Country-Specific Mortality and Growth Failure in Infancy and Yound Children and Association With Material Stature

Use interactive graphics and maps to view and sort country-specific infant and early dhildhood mortality and growth failure data and their association with maternal

Citing articles are presented as examples only. In non-demo SCM6 implementation, integration with CrossRef’s "Cited By" API will populate this tab (http://www.crossref.org/citedby.html).

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In