0

Full Content is available to subscribers

Subscribe/Learn More  >

Assessment of the Horn Mountain Spar in Hurricane Ivan

[+] Author Affiliations
Qi Xu

Technip Offshore, Inc., Houston, TX

Stephen Perryman

BP America, Inc., Houston, TX

Igor Prislin

BMT Scientific Marine Services, Inc., Escondido, CA

Paper No. OMAE2007-29354, pp. 385-395; 11 pages
doi:10.1115/OMAE2007-29354
From:
  • ASME 2007 26th International Conference on Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering
  • Volume 1: Offshore Technology; Special Symposium on Ocean Measurements and Their Influence on Design
  • San Diego, California, USA, June 10–15, 2007
  • Conference Sponsors: Ocean, Offshore and Arctic Engineering Division
  • ISBN: 0-7918-4267-3 | eISBN: 0-7918-3799-8
  • Copyright © 2007 by ASME

abstract

The Horn Mountain Spar experienced the full strength of Hurricane Ivan, a virtually 2500-yr wave and 600-yr wind in the Gulf of Mexico [1], in 2004. The measured and hindcast sea state reached a 53ft significant wave height and 88 knot wind speed (1-hr average at 10m elevation), which is significantly higher than the spar’s maximum design criteria of 41.7 ft wave height and 78.2 knot wind speed. Both the environment and spar responses in the hurricane were measured. However, 6 hours prior to the peak of the storm, the generator which powered the instrumentation stopped, preventing further measurements. In order to estimate the spar’s actual responses at the peak of the storm and to evaluate the accuracy of the existing spar motion analysis tools, a blind analysis test was performed using the measured and hindcast environmental conditions as input. The analysis results were then compared to the last available measurements of the spar responses in the hurricane. Since the analysis from the design phase was known to be conservative, a fully coupled spar motion analysis model was used in this blind analysis test in order to achieve a higher level of accuracy. The environmental condition was also modeled to a higher level of detail than in the design phase, including wave spreading, dual-peak wave spectrum, etc. Some minor adjustments to the fully coupled model were necessary to achieve the desired accuracy. From the blind test and the subsequent motion analysis for the peak of the storm, the following conclusions can be drawn: 1) The result from the fully coupled analysis model generally agrees very well with the measured spar motion responses early in the storm (when measurements were still available). 2) The spar’s pitch, roll and heave responses were estimated to be within the design limit even though the environment measured at a nearby platform significantly exceeded the maximum design condition at the peak of the storm. There was no drilling rig on the spar at the time of the storm. The findings confirm both the robustness of the current spar design practice and the accuracy of the spar analysis tools.

Copyright © 2007 by ASME
Topics: Spar platforms

Figures

Tables

Interactive Graphics

Video

Country-Specific Mortality and Growth Failure in Infancy and Yound Children and Association With Material Stature

Use interactive graphics and maps to view and sort country-specific infant and early dhildhood mortality and growth failure data and their association with maternal

NOTE:
Citing articles are presented as examples only. In non-demo SCM6 implementation, integration with CrossRef’s "Cited By" API will populate this tab (http://www.crossref.org/citedby.html).

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In