0

Full Content is available to subscribers

Subscribe/Learn More  >

Comparison Between American and European Methods For Admitting Bypass Steam Into a Steam Surface Condenser: Advantages and Disadvantages of Each Practice

[+] Author Affiliations
Ranga Nadig, Michael Phipps

Holtec International, Marlton, NJ

Paper No. POWER2006-88184, pp. 61-72; 12 pages
doi:10.1115/POWER2006-88184
From:
  • ASME 2006 Power Conference
  • ASME 2006 Power Conference
  • Atlanta, Georgia, USA, May 2–4, 2006
  • Conference Sponsors: Power Division
  • ISBN: 0-7918-4205-3 | eISBN: 0-7918-3776-9
  • Copyright © 2006 by ASME

abstract

Combined cycle plants are in operation in every part of the globe. The majority of the combined cycle plants have been designed by architect engineering companies in the USA or in Europe. The US standards for plant design are different from those in Europe. In spite of the differences, both design practices achieve the common goal of efficient and reliable electrical power generation. The method for admission of bypass steam into a condenser in the U.S. is substantially different from that in Europe. In the US practice, bypass steam entering the condenser is at relatively high pressures and is superheated. In the European practice, the bypass steam entering the condenser is at relatively low pressures and is wet. Each practice serves the common purpose of condensing bypass steam in the condenser and each practice has its own disadvantages and disadvantages. Tube failures are encountered in each practice. These tube failures are caused by droplets in the (moist) high velocity bypass steam. Low condenser pressures, improper design / control / operation of pressure reducing desuperheating valve (PRD valve), and improper drainage of bypass header lines are some of the major reasons that cause an environment favorable for tube failures. This paper examines the US and European methods for admitting bypass steam into a condenser. The advantages and disadvantages of each practice are discussed. For each practice, the performance in bypass mode for varying condenser pressures, bypass steam flow rates, support plate spacing, and moisture pockets quality are evaluated. Both actual and critical steam velocities are calculated. Condenser operating points prone to flow-induced vibration and associated tube failures are predicted.

Copyright © 2006 by ASME

Figures

Tables

Interactive Graphics

Video

Country-Specific Mortality and Growth Failure in Infancy and Yound Children and Association With Material Stature

Use interactive graphics and maps to view and sort country-specific infant and early dhildhood mortality and growth failure data and their association with maternal

NOTE:
Citing articles are presented as examples only. In non-demo SCM6 implementation, integration with CrossRef’s "Cited By" API will populate this tab (http://www.crossref.org/citedby.html).

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In