0

Full Content is available to subscribers

Subscribe/Learn More  >

A Framework for Warranty Prediction During Product Development

[+] Author Affiliations
Marcos Esterman, Philip Gerst, Paul H. Stiebitz

Rochester Institute of Technology

Kosuke Ishii

Stanford University

Paper No. IMECE2005-82024, pp. 381-388; 8 pages
doi:10.1115/IMECE2005-82024
From:
  • ASME 2005 International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition
  • Design Engineering, Parts A and B
  • Orlando, Florida, USA, November 5 – 11, 2005
  • Conference Sponsors: Design Engineering Division
  • ISBN: 0-7918-4215-0 | eISBN: 0-7918-3769-6
  • Copyright © 2005 by ASME

abstract

This paper describes the challenges faced by companies to manage warranty performance during product development. Understanding and reducing warranty cost often focuses exclusively on the analysis of product failures. However, warranty costs can also be incurred by events such as misaligned customer expectations that do not involve a product failure, per se. Many experts agree that effective management of system reliability and reliability validation during product development is a key to achieve superior time to market and life cycle quality. The paper first surveys the challenges faced by various organizations ranging from consumer electronics to aircraft engines to experimental high-energy physics accelerators. From the survey emerge some key and common issues that these companies face: identification of failure events; reliability modeling and prediction; prototyping and validation testing. The paper then reviews the current state of the art to identify areas for improvements as well as needed integrations in order to develop a comprehensive framework that will be useful to product developers to manage and predict warranty performance during product development. This framework extends and integrates three areas: 1) extend scenario-based FMEA to include the diagnosis and repair of failure events as part of the scenario; 2) use of Bayesian methods to integrate field data, product development data and engineering judgments; 3) generate costs models that allow tradeoff studies between product design, service model design and warranty policies. The paper concludes by presenting a future research agenda.

Copyright © 2005 by ASME

Figures

Tables

Interactive Graphics

Video

Country-Specific Mortality and Growth Failure in Infancy and Yound Children and Association With Material Stature

Use interactive graphics and maps to view and sort country-specific infant and early dhildhood mortality and growth failure data and their association with maternal

NOTE:
Citing articles are presented as examples only. In non-demo SCM6 implementation, integration with CrossRef’s "Cited By" API will populate this tab (http://www.crossref.org/citedby.html).

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In