0

Full Content is available to subscribers

Subscribe/Learn More  >

Fracture Control Offshore Pipelines: Advantages of Using Direct Calculations in Fracture Assessments of Pipelines

[+] Author Affiliations
Christian Thaulow, Bjo̸rn Skallerud, Espen Berg

Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway

K. R. Jayadevan

Government Engineering College, Thrissur, Kerala, India

Paper No. OMAE2005-67521, pp. 675-681; 7 pages
doi:10.1115/OMAE2005-67521
From:
  • ASME 2005 24th International Conference on Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering
  • 24th International Conference on Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering: Volume 3
  • Halkidiki, Greece, June 12–17, 2005
  • Conference Sponsors: Ocean, Offshore and Arctic Engineering Division
  • ISBN: 0-7918-4197-9 | eISBN: 0-7918-3759-9
  • Copyright © 2005 by ASME

abstract

Surface cracks pose major challenges for the structural integrity of pipelines. In fracture assessment programs the use of constraint parameters, such as the T-stress, along with K, J or CTOD are important to account for the limitations of single-parameter fracture mechanics. However, the three-dimensional nature of surface cracks precludes detailed 3-D finite element modeling for routine calculations. Here line-spring/shell-element models are demonstrated to be an efficient and reasonably accurate tool for constraint estimation even under large deformation levels when general yielding prevails in the pipe. Envisaging the potential use of this procedure in fracture analysis of pipelines, a new software, LINKpipe, has been developed. The program has been developed as a part of the Joint Industry project Fracture Control Offshore Pipelines. The objective of this project is to study the behaviour of defected girth welds in pipelines subject to construction and operational loads ever experienced before. The calculations have been performed in close cooperation with the project participants; see presentations of project-colleagues at OMAE 2005: Bruschi et al (2005), O̸stby (2005), Nyhus et al (2005) and Sandvik et al (2005). In this paper the line-spring calculations are compared with 3-D FE calculations and computations according to BS 7910. A pipe geometry, with OD = 400mm, was selected for the comparisons. The line-spring calculations were close to the 3-D calculations, while BS7910 was very conservative for long cracks and unconservative for short cracks. In highly ductile materials, such as pipeline steels, considerably amount of stable crack growth can be tolerated prior to the final failure of the structure. A simple method for simulating ductile tearing in surface cracked pipes with the line-spring model has been developed. A detailed parametric study has been performed to examine the effect of ductile tearing for pipes loaded in tensile, bending and with internal pressure. A significant reduction in deformation capacity from the stationary case is noticed. As the crack depth increases, the effect of ductile tearing becomes more important. And under biaxial loading a significant reduction of the deformation capacity is found as the internal pressure is increased. The development of the line-spring methodology paves the way for a transition from to-days rule-based design to direct calculations.

Copyright © 2005 by ASME

Figures

Tables

Interactive Graphics

Video

Country-Specific Mortality and Growth Failure in Infancy and Yound Children and Association With Material Stature

Use interactive graphics and maps to view and sort country-specific infant and early dhildhood mortality and growth failure data and their association with maternal

NOTE:
Citing articles are presented as examples only. In non-demo SCM6 implementation, integration with CrossRef’s "Cited By" API will populate this tab (http://www.crossref.org/citedby.html).

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In