0

Full Content is available to subscribers

Subscribe/Learn More  >

Risk Reduction of Jet Engine Product Development Using Technology Readiness Metrics

[+] Author Affiliations
Jonathan K. Niemeyer

Pratt & Whitney Division of United Technologies Corporation, East Hartford, CT

Daniel E. Whitney

Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA

Paper No. DETC2002/DTM-34000, pp. 3-13; 11 pages
doi:10.1115/DETC2002/DTM-34000
From:
  • ASME 2002 International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference
  • Volume 4: 14th International Conference on Design Theory and Methodology, Integrated Systems Design, and Engineering Design and Culture
  • Montreal, Quebec, Canada, September 29–October 2, 2002
  • Conference Sponsors: Design Engineering Division, Computers and Information in Engineering Division
  • ISBN: 0-7918-3624-X
  • Copyright © 2002 by ASME

abstract

This paper looks at the product development process as an exercise in risk reduction and performs a critical analysis of how gas turbine engine manufacturers weigh the competing risks associated with on-time delivery, product quality, and development costs. Three frameworks are used to focus the analysis: • Iteration by using multiple attempts to converge to an acceptable solution. • Maintaining options in development, and delaying convergence to a single design. • Improving the organization’s predictive capability prior to committing to a particular set of performance goals, designs, or technologies for a product. This is explored from the perspective of “technology readiness”. For six gas turbine engine development programs, case studies were performed to assess the effectiveness of the product development process by measuring how well the engine met its guaranteed level of fuel consumption. For each development program, performance against guarantees was compared against technology readiness levels (TRL) at program launch when performance was guaranteed by contract to customers, and against the degree of flexibility provided to designers to react once performance shortfalls were known. Decomposition of the engine system into sub-systems was necessary to specifically define TRL, parallel efforts, and iteration. Risk strategies were compared in light of the time sensitivity of the quality of information, the cost of engineering changes, contractual penalties, and lead times associated with implementing improvements.

Copyright © 2002 by ASME

Figures

Tables

Interactive Graphics

Video

Country-Specific Mortality and Growth Failure in Infancy and Yound Children and Association With Material Stature

Use interactive graphics and maps to view and sort country-specific infant and early dhildhood mortality and growth failure data and their association with maternal

NOTE:
Citing articles are presented as examples only. In non-demo SCM6 implementation, integration with CrossRef’s "Cited By" API will populate this tab (http://www.crossref.org/citedby.html).

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In