0

Full Content is available to subscribers

Subscribe/Learn More  >

A Verified Non-Linear Regression Model for Elastic Stiffness Estimates of Finite Composite Domains Considering Combined Effects of Volume Fractions, Shapes, Orientations, Locations, and Number of Multiple Inclusions

[+] Author Affiliations
Ilige S. Hage, Ré-Mi Hage

Notre Dame University - Louaize, Zouk Mosbeh, Lebanon

Charbel Y. Seif, Ramsey F. Hamade

American University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon

Paper No. IMECE2018-86231, pp. V009T12A022; 9 pages
doi:10.1115/IMECE2018-86231
From:
  • ASME 2018 International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition
  • Volume 9: Mechanics of Solids, Structures, and Fluids
  • Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA, November 9–15, 2018
  • Conference Sponsors: ASME
  • ISBN: 978-0-7918-5214-9
  • Copyright © 2018 by ASME

abstract

A non-linear regression model using SAS/STAT (JMP® software; Proc regression module) is developed for estimating the elastic stiffness of finite composite domains considering the combined effects of volume fractions, shapes, orientations, inclusion locations, and number of multiple inclusions. These estimates are compared to numerical solutions that utilized another developed homogenization methodology by the authors (dubbed the generalized stiffness formulation, GSF) to numerically determine the elastic stiffness tensor of a composite domain having multiple inclusions with various combinations of geometric attributes. For each inclusion, these considered variables represent the inclusions’ combined attributes of volume fraction, aspect ratio, orientation, number of inclusions, and their locations. The GSF methodology’s solutions were compared against literature-reported solutions of simple cases according to such well-known techniques as Mori-Tanaka and generalized self-consistent type methods. In these test cases, the effect of only one variable was considered at a time: volume fraction, aspect ratio, or orientation (omitting the number and locations of inclusions). For experimental corroboration of the numerical solutions, testing (uniaxial compression) was performed on test cases of 3D printed test cubes.

The regression equation returns estimates of the composite’s ratio of normalized longitudinal modulus (E11) to that of the matrix modulus (Em) or E11/Em when considering any combination of all of the aforementioned inclusions’ variables. All parameters were statistically analyzed with the parameters retained are only those deemed statistically significant (p-values less than 0.05). Values returned by the regression stiffness formulation solutions were compared against values returned by the GSF formulation numerical and against the experimentally found stiffness values. Results show good agreement between the regression model estimates as compared with both numerical and experimental results.

Copyright © 2018 by ASME

Figures

Tables

Interactive Graphics

Video

Country-Specific Mortality and Growth Failure in Infancy and Yound Children and Association With Material Stature

Use interactive graphics and maps to view and sort country-specific infant and early dhildhood mortality and growth failure data and their association with maternal

NOTE:
Citing articles are presented as examples only. In non-demo SCM6 implementation, integration with CrossRef’s "Cited By" API will populate this tab (http://www.crossref.org/citedby.html).

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In