0

Full Content is available to subscribers

Subscribe/Learn More  >

A Critical Analysis of the Differences Among Design Methods for Low-Speed Axial Fans

[+] Author Affiliations
Stefano Castegnaro

University of Padova, Padova, Italy

Paper No. GT2017-64276, pp. V001T09A008; 11 pages
doi:10.1115/GT2017-64276
From:
  • ASME Turbo Expo 2017: Turbomachinery Technical Conference and Exposition
  • Volume 1: Aircraft Engine; Fans and Blowers; Marine; Honors and Awards
  • Charlotte, North Carolina, USA, June 26–30, 2017
  • Conference Sponsors: International Gas Turbine Institute
  • ISBN: 978-0-7918-5077-0
  • Copyright © 2017 by ASME

abstract

Some methodological differences exist among the design methods for axial-flow fans. These differences generate confusion in the mind of the unexperienced fan designer, who is unaware of which method ensures the achievement of the required pressure rise at highest efficiency. In this work three important differences that appear comparing the classic methods of fan blading design are highlighted and analyzed: i) the choice of the airfoil, ii) the choice of the solidity distribution, and iii) the computation of the stagger angle of the blade elements. A fourth aspect regards the selection of the rotor number of blades. This aspect is treated in relation to the dubious applicability of the drag annulus correlation by Howell to low hub-to-tip ratio fan design and analysis. CFD simulations are performed on three case-study rotor-only fans, comparing blades systematically designed varying the airfoils (British C4 vs American NACA-65), the solidity distribution (Diffusion Factor criterion against the arbitrary selection of the blade-element lift coefficient) and the computation of the stagger angle (with respect to the inlet flow velocity or the mean one). The accuracy of XFOIL-predicted data at low Reynolds number (e.g., 300000) in designing small-to-medium fans is discussed as well. For each of the previous design aspects, results suggest the best indication among those suggested in the classic literature to achieve fan requirements.

Copyright © 2017 by ASME

Figures

Tables

Interactive Graphics

Video

Country-Specific Mortality and Growth Failure in Infancy and Yound Children and Association With Material Stature

Use interactive graphics and maps to view and sort country-specific infant and early dhildhood mortality and growth failure data and their association with maternal

NOTE:
Citing articles are presented as examples only. In non-demo SCM6 implementation, integration with CrossRef’s "Cited By" API will populate this tab (http://www.crossref.org/citedby.html).

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In