0

Full Content is available to subscribers

Subscribe/Learn More  >

Current Drag From Tow and Wind Tunnel Tests of a FLNG Hull

[+] Author Affiliations
Zhenjia (Jerry) Huang, Scott T. Slocum

ExxonMobil Upstream Research Company, Spring, TX

Jang Kim, Hyunchul Jang

Technip, Houston, TX

Paper No. OMAE2016-54493, pp. V001T01A029; 9 pages
doi:10.1115/OMAE2016-54493
From:
  • ASME 2016 35th International Conference on Ocean, Offshore and Arctic Engineering
  • Volume 1: Offshore Technology; Offshore Geotechnics
  • Busan, South Korea, June 19–24, 2016
  • Conference Sponsors: Ocean, Offshore and Arctic Engineering Division
  • ISBN: 978-0-7918-4992-7
  • Copyright © 2016 by ASME

abstract

In this paper, the current drag of a barge-shaped floating liquefied natural gas (FLNG) vessel was studied. Three model tests were performed — a wind tunnel model test, a submerged double-body tow test and a surface tow test. Computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulations were carried out to gain further insights into the test results. During testing, the tow speed was kept low to avoid surface waves. When the current heading was around the beam current direction, the transverse drag coefficient measured from the wind tunnel test was significantly lower than those of the submerged tow and surface tow tests. The submerged tow and the surface tow provided similar drag coefficients. Results presented in this paper indicated that the difference between the wind tunnel test and the tow tests was caused by the wind tunnel boundary layer effect on the incoming wind profile and formation of a recirculation zone on the upstream side of the model, with a possible additional contribution from the wind tunnel floor constraint on the flow in the wake. Such effects are not accounted for with the simple corrections based on flow velocity reduction in the wind tunnel boundary layer. When conducting future wind tunnel model tests for barge-shaped FLNG hulls, one should consider the potential under-measurement of the transverse drag. In this paper, details of the FLNG model, test setup, test quality assurance (QA), measurement and CFD simulation results are presented, as well as discussions and recommendations for model testing.

Copyright © 2016 by ASME

Figures

Tables

Interactive Graphics

Video

Country-Specific Mortality and Growth Failure in Infancy and Yound Children and Association With Material Stature

Use interactive graphics and maps to view and sort country-specific infant and early dhildhood mortality and growth failure data and their association with maternal

NOTE:
Citing articles are presented as examples only. In non-demo SCM6 implementation, integration with CrossRef’s "Cited By" API will populate this tab (http://www.crossref.org/citedby.html).

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In